A Pair of Strikers?
When David Weir was appointed I preached for patience, eight
games in and that seems in short supply amongst many Blades fans at the moment.
Short-termism abounds in football these days, not least driven by financial pressures
and media focus on the game, but when preaching for patience pre-season, no one
anticipated one win and four points from eight games, and a failure to beat two
League Two teams over 90 minutes in the cup competitions. Consolidation maybe,
but not struggling to stay out of the bottom four.
Whilst Weir has clearly instilled a passing philosophy in
his team, the fact it breaks down in the final third means goals are at a
premium and there is further pressure on a defence seemingly capable of making
mistakes we rarely saw over the last two seasons. A failure to get players into
the box, a failure to put meaningful balls into the box and a failure to shoot
are borne in the statistics below. They are now 2 games old, but little has
changed.
 |
| www.experimental361.com - Thanks to Ben Mayhew |
 |
| www.experimental361.com - Thanks to Ben Mayhew |
Weir's case is hardly helped by his post-match comments. Too
often bemoaning luck, too stubborn to admit his failings - failings that are
laid out for all to see, too protective of players who look mentally shot when
they go a goal behind.
As the saying goes, "You can fool some of the people,
some of the time……." Saturday reached a new disappointing low, with the
manager claiming in his post-match interview that we had had 24 chances. The stats
reported widely in the media said 12 shots, with 3 on target. I recall only one
meaningful save by Declan Rudd and most of those chances came from set-pieces
and shots from outside the penalty area. In that context, Weir's comments were
like throwing a match on tinder dry emotions and anger.
Many Blades fans have taken on the mantle of Mike Bassett
impersonators, demanding a switch to 4-4-2 (or Four, Four, F***ing Two in true Mike Bassett fashion); yet that isn't necessarily the
panacea that some may think. We hardly looked effective when switching to that
formation against Preston, although heads had dropped and we were chasing the
game by then. 4-2-3-1 can work successfully in the lower divisions; it has
taken Chesterfield to the top of League 2, but that has followed a season of
consolidation in League 2 and 12 months of Paul Cook bringing in his players and
moulding his team. The key is having players suited to its demands, time to gel
and with 11 new arrivals at Bramall Lane, the jigsaw remains incomplete.
This idea of a huge footballing transition taking place at Bramall Lane is over-emphasised and
this idea that passing football is the panacea isn't wholly correct. The primary
purpose is to win and some of the most exciting times I have had watching
United were under Dave Bassett and Neil Warnock's stewardship - classed as
direct football, but effective with goalmouth action and still good to watch as
a spectator.
Fans want to see exciting matches. Danny Wilson's passing football had become slightly more direct at the end of last season, but was boring
and had no end product. I didn't agree with sacking him and rather like that
decision, a minor change was required, not a seismic shift. What is happening at United is not a
significant change in football culture. It is a change in tactics and has rapidly
become a significant change in personnel. Both of which have made Weir's job
all the harder and that summarises the transition we are seeing.
Not all is lost. Teams can recover from this position; Bournemouth gained
automatic promotion from this division last season after finding themselves
20th after ten games and with just 8 points. Having said that, it took the
removal of Paul Groves as manager and the re-appointment of Eddie Howe to kick
start their season.
In a bizarre similarity Groves was sacked after a 4-1 defeat
to Crawley, United's tenth league opponents a week on Friday. The parallels are
even more intriguing when you read the statement Cherries' then chairman Eddie
Mitchell made to the BBC.
"I would urge our
supporters to recognise the time and effort that Paul and Shaun (Brooks -
Groves' assistant) invested in the first team and their unwavering
determination to produce an attractive brand of football.
"As chairman of
AFC Bournemouth, I have personally recognised the direction in which they were
trying to take the team in terms of tactics and style of play, and throughout
their time in charge they have had my full support.
"However, I
believe that luck has not been on their side during their short period at the
helm.
"As we know,
football is a results business, but most people will be unaware of the hard
work and dedication that they put in behind the scenes to help this club move
forward."
In a newly minted club a new manager was given an objective
of producing an attractive brand of football, there was recognition of what
they were trying (but failing) to achieve, there was a lack of luck, despite
the hard work and dedication. This all seems very familiar, doesn't it?
So why don't I think a change is required at Bramall Lane
right now? Fans point to the successful start of Leyton Orient, but Russell
Slade has been given time to build a team, including a spell at the bottom of
the division. Time he wouldn't be afforded at a bigger club with greater
expectations, like United. Another key aspect was highlighted in the post-match
interview when Kevin Lisbie explained how his strike partnership with David
Mooney had been given time to develop and gel.
With a combination of incoming players, many of whom fans would
expect to be pushing for the first team, still being integrated and injuries,
Weir is yet to play the same starting eleven from one game to the next. You
could argue that he is yet to find the right combination, but we have to back
him and the team for the foreseeable future. One win, one sneaky 1-0 win, one
sneaky 1-0 win with a scruffy bundled in goal would lift confidence and might
just be the re-start to the season we need.
We are not part of an experiment, as some have suggested. We
are a club where a manager is learning and learning the hard way. Weir could
help himself with a bit more openness and honesty post match. Weir could help
himself by showing a little flexibility and a little adventure - not dragging
all the players back to defend a corner when one down late in a game, altering the
game plan and player roles when chasing a game. Weir could look at some of his
man-management - having a non-playing member of the squad tell fans post-match
that he doesn't know when he will be playing next as "the manager isn't talking
to me" is only going to cause more concern and dis-quiet. And the players could
help him by playing with the tempo and energy, both in and out of possession,
that the manager advocates and show a bit of bottle and fight. Maybe we need
more than one leader on the pitch? Maybe we need a new leader on the pitch?
If Weir remains in charge I think things will improve over the
season. It will be by no means a successful season, but the season many of us
said we expected in the Summer. The thing is; it is okay saying that it is a
season of consolidation (pre-investment), but how many would truly accept it if
that was the outcome? The "investment" is a game changer in many
people's eyes, probably more of a short term changer to them than the reality. Maybe
some fans need to be as realistic as they claim to be.
Perestroika
On Saturday I had the pleasure of chatting to new United
Director James (Jim) Phipps - Principal Advisor to HRH Prince Abdullah bin
Mosaad bin Abdulaziz Al Saud. Stood outside the Directors' Entrance post-match,
along with a couple of fellow Blades fans, we talked for around 25 minutes on
various Blades related topics from the investment, to the players, the manager
and the performances.
I had seen his tweets (@JamesDPhipps) in the days leading up to the match and I was
impressed with the way he responded to fans expressing their concerns regarding
the team's performance, the signing of Marlon King and the state of the club.
After an exchange of tweets I had arranged to meet him.
I am not going to repeat here all that was said whilst Jim leant
on the railing in the South Stand Car Park, but I can give an overview and why
it re-affirmed my view that we have to back David Weir and the team for now.
Jim was positive about the clear improvements that could be
seen in the first half, when compared with recent games, and suggested it was a
sign that plans were coming together. He had already been down to see the
manager and players in the dressing room and felt that the increase in chances
created was a positive sign, although he acknowledged my reservations about
where the shots were coming in from.
He highlighted how the timing of the investment was not the best
for the manager, suddenly placing greater expectations on him, perhaps
perceived expectations rather than directly emanating from the boardroom. The
money coming in led to an influx of players both at the start of the season and
in the loan window that are going to take a while to fit in and gel with the existing
squad. Obviously we wall want that as soon as possible, but we need to be
realistic and recognise incremental improvement.
He re-enforced his belief that we had a man who will be a great
manager and that he had the full support and time to put this right. The board
had placed a lot of faith in Weir, his presentation to the incoming board members
on his plans had impressed them greatly, but Jim recognised that fans had concerns
and a right to express them. In acknowledging that fans have opinions that
deserve to be heard he wanted to know about the reaction of the fans in other
parts of the ground, asking where we were sat and the feelings being expressed.
Along with the other fans present I offered our opinion on a
few aspects of the playing squad and he offered candid opinions regarding a couple
of issues that I wouldn’t repeat here. He did however, recognise a need for
mental toughness and the need for leaders on the pitch. The players have as big
a role to play as the manager.
I asked him of his previous football experience, did he
follow any MLS teams? He said not, but he mentioned his previous role with the
Prince at Al Hilal (Saudi Arabia's biggest club and six times Asian champions),
but highlighted the short term nature of football business in Middle East, with
a high managerial turnover and focus on overseas coaches. He rightly
highlighted that this is very different to football over here.
Jim seems keen to understand and learn what Blades fans
think - not just the impassioned heat of the moment comments - but more
reflective thought as well. He wants to embrace English football culture and
understand what it means to be a supporter; what it means to be a Blade. I have
no doubt that all this is subsequently shared with the Prince.
I know I was not the only Blades fan he spoke with that day.
This wasn't some privileged meeting. I didn't share this on Saturday night, when
challenged to do so, as I didn't think that everything that was said needed
broadcasting on twitter, where 140 character limits means things can be taken
out of context. The fact that many of these views have been stressed repeatedly
since in his interaction on twitter means I am more comfortable sharing them
here than I would have been otherwise.
Jim expects to be over at least twice a month for the foreseeable
future and when the Prince isn't over, he immediately gets a call at the final
whistle for a report and update. It strikes me that he is an accessible face of
the boardroom and shares his views in a thoughtful and considered manner; with
an occasional bluntness that most Sheffielders would heartily appreciate.
Since speaking it is pleasing to see the continued
interaction on twitter. You could argue that by picking up on fans queries on
kit manufacture, ticket office phone lines etc. that he is being dragged into
the minutiae, but these are the little things that matter to the fans, aside
from results on the pitch. In each instance he has taken the comments on board
and returned later with feedback from the relevant department head. You cannot
say fairer than that. He was also honest enough to say we have "sucked for
two months"!
The club have held frequent Meet the Board and Meet the Manager
meetings in recent months. Open and honest opinion from the boardroom is much
welcomed by United fans. Maybe we can have a bit of the same from the dressing
room and coaching staff. That might just Unite us a little bit more.
