Following last weekend's Premier League fixtures, the BBC
Sport twitter account decided to share a fact with their followers. Sadly it
was one of those flawed facts that assumes that top flight football has only
existed for 20 years and everything before it just isn't relevant.
Everything these days is referred to in terms of "the
Premier League era", however the record for the worst start in top flight
history was not set last week. QPR equalled it. Not that the club involved would want that tag,
but I guess a happy ending makes it more palatable.
Just under two years before the Premier league kicked off, Sheffield United reached the 22nd December 1990 sitting bottom of Division 1 after 16 games and
with just 4 points to their name. They were 8 points behind QPR , who sat one
place higher and, given their awful goal difference, some 12 points from
safety. The visitors to Bramall Lane that cold and misty afternoon were
Nottingham Forest and the victory that followed kick-started United's season.
Ian Bryson scored two and Brian Deane the other in a 3-2 win.
Bryson coming close to what would have been his only career
hat trick, as the ball hit both posts and came back out again. When United took
the lead; Bryson became only the 4th player to score a league goal
for United all season. However the joy was short lived as Forest scored from
the re-start without a United player touching the ball. Future Blades player
Franz Carr playing in Roy Keane for the equaliser.
Keane then played Stuart Pearce in for Forest to take the
lead and that first league victory seemed a distant dream. Then two brilliant
crosses from the right wing and the boot of Carl Bradshaw, led to pinpoint
headers first from Bryson and then from Deane.
The final whistle brought slightly surreal scenes, as
unbridled relief led to a celebratory pitch invasion from jubilant fans. It had
the feel of a promotion clinching match or a cup giant-killing. As two goal
hero Ian Bryson described it;
"It was a great
relief to get our first win and the fans obviously felt the same, we felt we
had been playing well but we just couldn't get the win. Once we won that game
the confidence within the squad grew and we gradually moved up the table."
The victory did have a positive effect, United winning 1-0
in their next game away at Luton Town, but it then took until late January for
United to put any kind of form together. Through to the beginning of March they
went on a run of 8 wins and a draw in 9 games. By season end they had won 13
games and eventually stayed up in 13th place. That was 12 points clear of the
relegation places (only two teams went down) and 9 points clear of third bottom
(ordinarily the last relegation place). Interestingly, QPR the team directly
above them just before Christmas also survived finishing one place lower.
Brian Deane also explained how United and manager Dave
Basset fashioned that change in form.
"It was an era
where things were changing in football. Dave Bassett knew that he didn’t have a
team that could compete technically with some of the better teams. We couldn’t
afford some of the players that some of the other clubs had, they wouldn’t be
attracted to come to Bramall Lane and play. But we found ways of equalising the
situation by being a little bit more scientific in our approach to games."
"I can’t say we
were the first but we were certainly one of the first. If you look at what
happened up to the point of us having four points just before Christmas; we
actually introduced a new diet, we introduced new training methods, we had a fitness
trainer (Ed Baranowski) come in twice a week and we became fitter and stronger
than other teams. We scored more goals in the last ten minutes than other teams
and they struggled to cope with us. In the end we survived because we adapted
and changed and no one else had cottoned on to what we were doing. If they had
been doing it, then the probability is that we would have struggled."
So can QPR take comfort from the Blades' turnaround that
season? Speaking earlier this season Bryson told me;
"Although the
league is different now, I don't think anyone will survive from that kind of
position again."
Yet I think this season could prove the exception to the
rule; despite the fact QPR sit bottom on 7 points, some 8 points from safety.
So why do I think they are the team that could achieve this and are there any
similarities between now and 22 years ago.
Whilst it is true that money has distorted football in
recent years, you would have to say that QPR are in a position to turn this
around. In fact they are financially stronger than many of the clubs they will
be battling with in the fight for survival.
United benefited from the fact that they had many teams
around them that you would claim are beatable. The fact that they went on to
beat Manchester United, Everton, Villa and Chelsea certainly helped their cause, but United must have felt that
they stood a chance against the likes of Luton, Derby, Coventry and Sunderland.
QPR could legitimately claim the same. On paper they have a squad that should
at least be a match for many of the teams around them. The importance of
starting a run of wins and the impact it can have is exemplified by Norwich,
now 12th after 9 games without defeat.
It strikes me that team spirit is something lacking in
modern day football. maybe it has been "poisoned" by the money? After
all it is rare you get a team coming up that don't sign a few established star
names, often to the detriment of the overall team and the players who earned
their promotion. Few of Dave Bassett's
signings that season came from the top flight and for most it was the first
taste of top flight football. You could even argue that his biggest signing,
Vinnie Jones, caused as much disruption as positivity.
Talking to the players of that time, there was a real
"in this together" mentality, a closeness of team, club and fans that
you only rarely see in football these days and certainly not in the Premier
League. The nearest you can see to it now is perhaps Stoke, combining a team
ethic with a stoic belief in what they are doing. There are few egos in that
Stoke side, however there are plenty dotted throughout many of the other teams in the Premier
League, including those in the bottom quartile and in particular at Loftus Road.
Whilst, as Brian Deane explained, United benefited from
innovative thinking in terms of preparation, training etc. it is hard to see
where the Hoops can do anything revolutionary. However, they are in a position
to do something different. A change of manager, should bring new ideas and whilst that
might not necessarily translate into results straight away, there is potential
for long term improvement. QPR have certainly not seen the immediate boost that
"new manager syndrome" often provides, but it is hard not to believe
that Harry Redknapp's influence and potentially changes of system and roles
won't have an impact soon.
There was a different expectation level placed on managers
20 years ago. Following back to back promotions, there was little clamour for
changing the manager when the team were struggling to adapt at the top level. I
think that managers would not get the benefit of such time these days, that has
been shown at QPR, albeit on the back of one season of Premier League football
already. I just hope that Southampton show the patience Nigel Adkins' hard work
and success deserves, in similar circumstances to Dave Bassett 22 years ago.
No comments:
Post a Comment